Review by Rashbre.

A recent study discussed on Radio Four said that peak ‘book reading time’ for many people occurs in their teenage years. Something to do with set texts at school, I suppose. Later, I guess people divide into those who read books and those who don’t with special categories for non-fiction, historical, autobiography and sports.
I’m one of the people who does read and usually have one of those untidy piles of partly finished books. Two recent ones to be added are both blog influenced – Improbable by Adam Fawer (recommended by utenzi’s blog) and Taking Comfort by Roger Morris (who writes a blog and has some amusing reflections on getting the book published).
I decided to read the Roger Morris book as soon as it arrived from Amazon and here’s a few comments:
The story starts when our main character, Rob, sees a Japanese student with a ‘Hello Kitty’ binder throw herself in front of a tube train. Rob retrieves the folder and hides it in his briefcase, on the way to his new marketing job. At this point I was expecting a conventional mystery, but we see instead a nascent compulsive behaviour progressing in Rob and the way he views those around him.
Rob lands in a fairly typically described London City office, with the trappings of expensive desk furniture and a role which is not entirely obvious to the reader, or to Rob, it would seem. But that is incidental to the main emergence of his compulsive behaviour, which centres around collecting artifacts from misfortune. The Japanese folder is the first of a series of items he acquires in increasingly bizarre ways.
Interspersed with this are product analyses of everyday (and not so everyday) items, which are examined in minute detail, usually from a marketing perspective, sometimes by specification, and sometimes by benefit or functionality. This has a link to Rob’s professional world, but the same analysis transfers to other actions and situations in the story. This varies from making a cup of tea (an almost Haruki Murukami level of description here) to feature-listing velcro adjustable concealable police body armour.
So this becomes a story about human edginess and obsession as much as about a series of events. There’s a deadening of perspective (like in a madness) between the view of a fountain pen, a hand-gun and a claw hammer – all of which have important places in the plotline.
The situations accelerate in the last section of the book. Some unfinished business creates a situation where Rob’s obsessions become exposed. I won’t say more, in the interests of plot integrity, but there are some neat links to earlier parts of the book.
The author, Roger Morris, uses a style for the book which appears deliberately experimental and somewhat stylised. For example, there’s no speech marks in the text and this adds a sense of transference to the interpretations of character motive. Is the character really thinking the way described, or is it the perception of this state from inside of Rob’s head? I found myself thinking of Nikolai Gogol’s Diary of a Madman in places, where the sliding perspective appears rational when considered from within the head of the person describing it.
And in places there are references to idiom (how an American can ‘verbify’ most nouns) and a few other linguistic tricks to create a smile.
I found this an intense book to read. I found myself inside Rob’s head and the compulsive obsessive behaviour and a lowered sense of reality are distrubing traits, more so when they are blended with much other reality descriptions.
This is an interesting example of New Writing, I hope Roger does well from this experience and additionally continues his entertaining blog about the experience of writing.
And I feel I should also comment on the experience of the book itself. A hardback, 215 pages, weight, 0.315kg, Macmillan New Writing imprint, Heronwood Press Typesetting and Printed in China. You’ll know why I’m saying this if you read the book.
`Comment by Rashbre”
Bonzeriffic.
Now lets spring the ‘Author trap’… We need say 10 questions for Roger Morris to answer. I’ll suggest some and maybe you do the same? Feel free to remove some of mine…
Then we’ll ping him. He is highly likely to respond and we get an exclusive interview for your blog. Great japes!
POST TITLE: THE AUTHOR TRAP: TODAY…Roger Morris!
We thank Roger for visiting this site and agreeing to exclusive interview. Here’s our questions and his responses, which he first placed into comments and we then transcribed into this post.
1) HOW DID YOU GET STARTED WITH NOVEL WRITING?
2) HOW DID YOU DECIDE THE THEME FOR THIS NOVEL?
3) ARE THERE ANY PEOPLE THAT INSPIRED THE CHARACTERS OR THEME FOR THE BOOK?
4) WHAT ADVICE WOULD YOU GIVE TO OTHERS THINKING OF NOVEL WRITING?
5) HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE THE GENRE OF THE BOOK?
6) YOU CHOSE AN UNUSUAL WRITING STYLE – DIFFERENTIATED PUNCTUATION AND EMBEDDED FACTSHEETS. WHAT GAVE YOU THIS IDEA?
7) CAN YOU DESCRIBE ANY OTHER WRITING PROJECTS?
9) HAS THE BOOK’S PUBLICATION AFFECTED YOU IN ANY WAY?
10) IS THERE AN AMUSING ANECDOTE ABOUT THE BOOK?
And finally, thank you, Roger, for agreeing to participate in this interview.
1) You know how when you’re at school you’re encouraged to write stories – nobody told me to stop. I started a novel when I was in my twenties. I don’t think I ever finished it, not sure. I was writing it on an old fashioned manual typewriter. It used to drive my flatmates and neighbours mad, I’m sure. I did once get one complaint from a downstairs neighbour, who was very apologetic. She said it wouldn’t be so bad if it was faster and more even – it was because I used to break off and take long pauses while I was thinking what to type next. I was so embarrassed I bought an electric one. Then progressed to an old-style amstrad.
I’ve been blown away by the response from litbloggers and ordinary readers. It’s been amazing. All my colleagues at work are reading it and they keep coming up to me, saying things like, ‘Finished your book last night. Fabulous!’ Of course the ones that hate it keep politely quiet. But to stumble on reviews like Rashbre’s has been wonderful. Not to mention being invited to do this – or rather, to fall into this trap. The reception from the literary establishment has been disappointing, but predictable. I have coined a term for them: ‘the tosserati’. Please feel free to use it. I want to get it into general usage.
2) I was walking down the street in Crouch End where I live and I witnessed an armed robbery right in front of me. Pretty much like the one described in the book. There were a number of other bad things that happened too. Shit! Bad things happen even in Crouch End. I witnessed other bad stuff, some of which also found themselves into the book. Some didn’t. It was more spread out than in the book – I sort of thought that logically, or according to the laws of chance or something, it’s just as possible for a cluster of bad things to happen all at once as all spread out. It’s like the same numbers coming up week after week on the lottery. The idea of taking things to protect yourself seems like a very old magical idea, and seems quite natural to me. It’s akin to the thought that lightning doesn’t strike twice. I’ve never done it, I hasten to add but I can imagine the temptation.
3) I once went on an induction day at an insurance company that doesn’t exist any more. It’s name was very similar to Diamond. See if you can guess. Anyhow, the telephone conversation that takes place at the beginning of the book, between the old lady and the call handler, was pretty much verbatim. Other than that, I don’t know. I suppose a lot of people have fed into it, subconsciously.
4) Oh this is the hardest. I don’t think I’m in a position to give anyone advice. Read as much as you can, but everybody says that. Time – you’ve got to be fairly ruthless about making time to write. I got up early every morning to write TC. That helped. Generally, you’ve got to be a selfish, self-absorbed, self-motivated bastard.
5) I’m not very good at pinning down the genre. It was described to me as a literary thriller. Dunno if that does it. I would describe it as contemporary urban angst thriller type thingy.
6) The style, and punctuation, were deliberate. I wanted to create an overlap of thoughts, speech, action, so that objective and subjective realities were merged. (Sorry, that sounds really pretentious, doesn’t it?) The multiple viewpoint thing is also part of it. As for the embedded factsheets and marketing copy, that was a way of building up texture. I was also trying to use it to access character by concentrating on surface. Again, I win the Private Eye Pseud’s Corner award. But I feel there is something in it.
7) I’m always very cagey about works in progress, in case people come along and go, ‘You know that sounds like the biggest load of shit going.’ I would find that discouraging and maybe lose heart. But I am working on a novel at the moment, which is more conventional in some ways. (I put quote marks around direct speech.) It’s historical, crime, set in a country and city I’ve never been to – so that makes it equally mad in its own way, I suppose!
9) When I got my advance copy of the book, I said to Rachel, my wife, ‘Well, I can give up now.’ It was a joke. Am I buggery going to give up, but there was a sense of publication itself being the end I’d been working to, and now that I had achieved it…. I was somehow released from a ridiculous pressure.
10) Shortly before publication, I went into Waterstones near where I work, and said to the guy, ‘I just want to check if you’ll be getting a book. It’s not out yet, but I just wondered if you would be stocking it. It’s called Taking Comfort.’ He checked the system. ‘Taking Comfort by Roger Morris.’ ‘That’s right,’ I said. He looked at me a little strangely and said, ‘Are you Roger Morris?’ I fessed up. ‘You’d be surprised how many authors we get in here asking about their own books.’ Not really.
(Sorry, I put that story on my blog – but it’s the only one I can think of.)
Many thanks, Rob and Rashbre for trapping me so gently!
Excellent ! Next stage is to promote the interview back to a post in its own right and then to cross post to it from rashbre central, holyhouses etc.
Over to you, Bob!