
I realise that it's somewhat of a huge undertaking to attempt a review of three Le Carré novels, but – by chance – I happen to have read these three over the past couple of weeks, and taken together, they offer an overview of his long career.
Call for the Dead was published in 1961, his first novel, and his first to feature George Smiley, later the lead character in the Le Carré novels made famous by film and TV adaptations. Smiley's People was a BBC series, wasn't it? Prime candidate for BBC4 to show again, I should say.
The Night Manager is a more mature Le Carré – late middle-period, post Cold War, published in 1991. Some say it's a Bond parody, but it also reminded me of The Bourne Identity in a lot of ways. And Absolute Friends is his most recent novel, published 2004, so not only post Cold War, but post 9/11 too.
I've hinted at the other place that Le Carré has much to say about our current situation, what leads to it, how we ended up like this, and what's (probably) going on behind the scenes.
Spy novels take you into the hall of mirrors created by espionage, the weird nether-world of flexible moral standards and nothing – ever – being quite what it seems. The texts can be dense, difficult, sometimes slow, never quite getting to the point – which is precisely the point. Even a Big Picture person will find it hard to see the bigger picture, the backdrop, the broad strokes of what is actually going on. Because the thing about espionage – and I've read enough about it over the years to know this – is that nobody ever does see the bigger picture.
The gift of a fictional spy like Smiley is to give the impression of knowing more than you do in order to learn a little bit more than you do, in an endless process of Big Picture building. Smiley is prized for his ability to think. But the Big Picture never does resolve. Even as you're adding grains down here, it's flaking apart and disintegrating over there, like a castle in the sand as the tide comes in.
This is never more clear than in Call for the Dead, Smiley's first outing, in which he is revealed as a frustrated scholar and academic who has been co-opted into intelligence in a time of dire need, and can never quite get away again, even though he would like to. The earliest intelligence operations were all run by inspired amateurs like Smiley. Call for the Dead is short, as novels could sometimes be in times past, and at under 200 pages would probably be classed as a novella these days. It's still dense, though, with much to take in, and Le Carré's style always manages the double trick of espionage – leads you both towards and away from a resolution, like a fuse lit at both ends, narrating both before and after events simultaneously, aware of a bigger picture, but never quite laying it out in an easy way for you to take in at one go.
Smiley acts on an anonymous tip, conducts an affable interview with a minor civil servant about his communist past (at University, natch), decides he's a good chap, and is shocked to discover – the next day – that's he's committed suicide. That's the bones of it, what sets the plot in motion. And Smiley/Le Carré then plays catch up, peeling off layer after layer to get to some form of the truth. It's the cold war, and he finds himself pitted against an East German spy who once worked on the side of the Allies in the second world war, who was once a student of Smiley in Germany before the war, but whom Smiley had not recruited himself, believing him to be slightly unstable, a bit too obvious and vocal, too much of a risk.
Recruited by someone else, this character – Dieter Frey – turns out of be an incredibly good agent, of great value, a miraculous survivor, and now a tricky adversary. Smiley, who only gives the appearance of knowing more than he does, is always one step behind, and only able to follow at all because Dieter is using the craft as taught to him by Smiley, more or less unmodified. You send a postcard to arrange a meeting, but the text doesn't mean anything. What matters is the picture on the front, and how you've previously agreed to interpret that.
Nobody does see the big picture, because spying is a series of small acts of betrayal committed by small men and women. An "agent" in the parlance could be anyone – you or me, an office cleaner, a keeper of the keys, a receptionist. It's not going to be some high-powered, highly-paid individual – well, almost never. We live in a society that excludes people – all the time, all over the place. And as long as people are excluded, made to feel valueless and ignored as much as possible – as long as that happens, there will be a pool of potential recruits. Part of the craft lies in the ability to identify these people. I like to think I would have been a prime candidate, in different circumstances. It's hard to think of it as betraying your country when your country treats you like shit on its shoe. And sometimes you just do it for the cash. Or for a woman/man. As fickle as romantic love is, patriotic love is more so.
The Agent reports to his or her handler, someone with whom they have a relationship, and they pass the information on to the handler, who in turn passes it on, and so on. Sitting back at head office, the analysts – civil servants of whatever grade – assess and interpret the information. And thinkers like Smiley try to see the Big Picture. Of course, it might not be the information itself but the act of obtaining the information that matters more than anything. As in Orwell, the act of betrayal is sometimes all they're after.
Conflicts can arise, and they do. The British are spying on the East Germans, who spy on the British and the Americans, and the Americans are spying on everyone, including the British. And in the aftermath of the Cold War, Le Carré posits a conflict between the forces of so-called Pure Intelligence (those who just want the small acts of betrayal to continue, who want the information but don't want to act on it) and Enforcement (those who want to go in with guns blazing and kill the motherfuckers).
You can see it happening around you. Pure Intelligence hears the chatter about 9/11 or 7/7 in the run up, but doesn't want to act on it. No prosecutions please, we're British. No, you can't use our Intelligece information in a court of law, that would be unthinkable. Then the worst happens, and the Enforcers step in and say, fuck this, we want to nail these bastards. So then the Pure Intelligence people clam up and stop passing on the information. Or they pass on misinformation. Or they sabotage things in any number of other ways. They practice the art of the double bluff.
This is essentially the story of The Night Manager. Who is the worst man in the world? In this novel it's Roper, an international arms dealer, who will sell arms to anyone, on any side. He calls it "selling farms" and he's a billionaire of course, with a private island and a retinue of minor aristocrats and paid help. And he has a "signer", a front, someone whose name heads up the list of company directors, who signs all the contracts, so that Roper himself stays in the background, untouchable.
In The Night Manager, Enforcement decide to do something about him. Pure Intelligence take a back seat, until it transpires that Roper has decided to Buy British, in part, and – more importantly – Buy American. Never mind that he's supplying arms to Colombian Cocaine cartels, there are forces in the British and American governments who will let the deal go through, because the Toys are stamped "Made in the USA."
Far fetched? You think somehow not. The Iraqi Supergun springs to mind, doesn't it? A scandal after the fact, but – also – how did Saddam get those French missiles? Oh, and according to Roper, the first Gulf war was fought – not because of oil or Kuwaiti gold – but for the experience, for practice. Think about it: you have an ageing military class, with leaders hardened in Viet Nam about to retire. Who replaces them? Who trains the next generation in the ways of fighting wars? You need a new generation of battle-hardened veterans to pass on the knowledge to the the one after that.
In other words, a war every few years is inevitable. It all makes a lot more sense when you realise that they just need the practice.
The Night Manager is Jonathan Pine, a former soldier who takes refuge from the world in the late night service economy, but events lead him to Roper – and a hatred of Roper – and he volunteers to act as an agent and take him down. So his life is unravelled to a script, his reputation sullied, and he goes on the lam, bumping into Roper in an orchestrated way and penetrating his inner circle.
Of course, it all goes horribly wrong, with betrayal heaped upon betrayal, and as a bloodless coup takes place back in in Blighty, his fake cover story is used as a pretext to abandon him to torture and death. Only one man, his handler, is willing to go to lengths to secure his safety.
Which brings us on to Absolute Friends, in which Le Carré cleverly echoes some of the aspects of Call for the Dead, with a lightweight version of Smiley (Ted Mundy) befriending a lightweight version of Dieter (Sasha). Where earlier generations of spies were radicalised at Oxford and Cambridge in the 1930s, this generation arises out of the events of the 60s, when student radicals in Berlin lived in squats, skipped their lectures, and marched on the streets before some of them started to justify to themselves the use of violence and terrorism. The subtle point here is about the different kinds of learning. Whereas Smiley was a real scholar with real, in-depth knowledge, able in fact to teach at a high level whilst maintaining his cover, the radicals of the 60s for the most part merely skimmed the back cover blurb of radical books and pamphlets, and looked for leaders to follow.
There comes a parting of the ways. Some of them drift into corporate life, some drift into roles as minor civil servants, some bum around the world, and others end up in Palestinian training camps, or in Beirut, or just dead. It was interesting to me, as a Critical Theorist, to see all those familiar names bandied about by Le Carré, all those names that are used by radicals to justify violence. I remember sitting in Critical Theory seminars thinking, these people (meaning my fellow students) are complete cunts, here only to reinforce their own belief in murder and mayhem, wilfully twisting the words of others to make their kind of sense. Whereas I always struggled through these texts, wondering why they used so many made-up words and avoided making any actual point, my fellow students always had that one thing they thought they knew, that bit they'd skimmed from the back cover blurb.
This level of ignorance, this kind of naivety is exploited in Absolute Friends, first to recruit Mundy and Sasha as agents in the Cold War, and later to take advantage of their idealism in order to set them up as patsies in an onion skin anti-terrorist operation that is all smoke and mirrors and ends up with a terrorist cell exposed to the media which was actually nothing of the kind. The Big Picture here is that Enforcement is still at war with Pure Intelligence and our civilisation – such as it is – is in the not very capable hands of lightweights and fanatics.
If you were to pick one of these three to read, I'd say Absolute Friends is almost certainly up there with Le Carré's best – highly recommended. If you aren't charged with some of Le Carré's obvious seething anger after reading this, then you're doing something wrong, reading it upside-down perhaps. The unravelling of Ted Mundy is surely one of the best character explorations I've ever read, and if you want to understand just a little bit of the political world we live in, packing a few Le Carrés in your suitcase before you head off on your cheap flight and have your passport checked 97,000 times is a good start.
Recent Comments